Blog Posts for 2007

The blog on this website includes articles and editorials by James Freeman on subjects relevant to his legal practice. These writings are not legal advice and should not be taken as such. If you need to speak with an attorney, please contact us.

All content is copyright by The Law Offices of James M. Freeman. Readers are encouraged to share the content; which is allowable only with a link back to the relevant page on this website.

Please contact us if you have any questions about how these issues relate to your particular situation.


Uninsured Motorists in Illinois

Recently I attended traffic court with one of my clients. I am always shocked to see the light punishment people receive for not having insurance. For instance, I saw a woman plead guilty to blowing a stop sign and no insurance. She was fined $25.00 for blowing the stop and $50.00 for not having insurance. The court then assessed $55.00 in court costs for a whopping total of $130.00 in fines and costs.

I have a friend who hypothesizes that there are two types of people who pay for insurance. First, there are those who have assets to protect. Second, there are those who do not have assets, but who feel a moral obligation to follow the law. He points out that for someone who has no assets it is much cheaper to forgo insurance coverage.

When I bring this up with the Corporation Counsel or State's Attorney, they argue that under the Illinois Financial Responsibility laws an uninsured driver risks having their license suspended, but I don't see that happening when I'm at traffic court. I just see people like our aforementioned lucky lady getting hit with small fines and walking out of court with her license in hand.

Uninsured motorists pose a special risk to many cyclists as most car-free cyclists do not have uninsured motorists coverage. Drivers, on the other hand, often have uninsured/under insured motorist coverage that would be activated in the event of an accident with an uninsured driver. Since car-free cyclists do not carry such coverage, they are especially vulnerable to an uninsured driver.

I believe it would make sense to have fines for driving uninsured outweigh the cost of obtaining insurance in the first place. One would also think that the insurance lobby would love to see stiffer penalties for infractions involving financial responsibility laws in Illinois as it would offer more business for Insurance companies. As long as it is more cost effective to drive without insurance people will continue to do it. If we take away the financial motivation to forgo insurance perhaps we would see a drop in the number of uninsured motorists.

Hit-and-Run

People often think that if the driver flees after an accident there is no possibility of recovery. That may be true, but often it is not. I have personally handled cases in which we were able to locate a hit-and-run driver through thorough investigation. In each instance the initial assumption by the police was that the driver was uninsured, and therefore, fled the scene. In each instance this turned out to be untrue, and the driver did have valid insurance. These experiences led me to believe that drivers don't flee after they hit a cyclist because they don't have insurance, so much as they flee because they think they can get away with it.

I have also handled cases in which we were unable to locate the driver, however, I was able to find uninsured motorist coverage to cover the accident. This usually occurs when the victim cyclist owns a car or someone in their household or family owns a car and has uninsured motorist coverage. Uninsured motorist coverage can be activated by a hit-and-run accident and cover the loss even though you weren't driving the car at the time of the accident. In such an instance the insurance company who issued the uninsured motorist coverage steps in and assumes the position of the defendant hit-and-run driver.

Never assume that no recovery can be made just because the driver fled the scene. The best way to know if there is any possibility of recovery is to consult with an attorney. An attorney skilled in investigating hit-and-run accidents or locating insurance coverage may be able to help in the bleakest of situations.

An accident with no physical contact

From time to time I get calls from people who were injured in the process of avoiding a collision. Take the "dooring" example. In broad daylight ND (negligent Driver) parks his car on the east side of State Street. He spends a couple minutes turning things off and collecting his things before opening his door without looking. At exactly that same time, IC (Innocent Cyclist) is traveling northbound on State Street approaching and passing ND's car. IC sees ND's car door open just in time to swerve out of the way. She narrowly avoids hitting the door, but in doing so IC loses control of her bicycle and crashes causing injury and damage to her bicycle.

Often ND and IC are under the mistaken impression that there must be actual contact between the car and the cyclist. This is not true. Had it not been for ND's negligent and careless act of opening the door without looking IC never would have been injured and her property would not have been damaged. Under these facts IC has a valid claim for personal injury and property damage against ND.

This situation should be treated as any other accident regardless of whether or not there was any actual contact. Call the police, exchange information, get witnesses, seek medical attention, preserve evidence, and take pictures of any damage or injuries.

Snow Removal

It's the time of year when snow removal is an issue for everyone. It is important to remove snow from sidewalks. Clear sidewalks benefit everyone, and many people such as the elderly or those with disabilities can find it difficult if not impossible to negotiate a snow-filled sidewalk.

I'm a big advocate of having everyone do their share of shoveling. No one wants to hear someone complain about the condition of their walk when the complainer clearly hasn't made an effort to shovel. I know a guy who shovels his whole block, then goes around his neighborhood looking for walks to shovel. His rationale is that everyone has a responsibility to do their fair share- and he is right.

Chicago Muni Code section 10-8-180 requires:
Every owner, lessee, tenant, occupant or other person having charge of any building or lot of ground in the city abutting upon any public way or public place shall remove the snow and ice from the sidewalk in front of such building or lot of ground.

If the sidewalk is of greater width than five feet, it shall not be necessary for such person to remove snow and ice from the same for a space wider than five feet.

In case the snow and ice on the sidewalk shall be frozen so hard that it cannot be removed without injury to the pavement, the person having charge of any building or lot of ground as aforesaid shall, within the time specified, cause the sidewalk abutting on the said premises to be strewn with ashes, sand, sawdust, or some similar suitable material, and shall, as soon thereafter as the weather shall permit, thoroughly clean said sidewalk.

The snow which falls or accumulates during the day (excepting Sundays) before four p.m. shall be removed within three hours after the same has fallen or accumulated. The snow which falls or accumulates on Sunday or after four p.m. and during the night on other days shall be removed before ten a.m.

So to review:

  • Persons having charge of a building (lessees included) must remove snow and ice.
  • Remove snow within 3 hours if snow falls before 4:00pm except Sundays, otherwise it must be done by 10:00am the following day.
  • Ice and snow so frozen it cannot be removed must be strewn with ashes, sawdust, sand or other suitable material.

When are Police Required to Generate an Accident Report?

Reports must be filed in connection with any accident involving an injury, death or property damage in excess of $1,500 ($500 if there is no insurance coverage). See 625 ILCS 5/11-406 (from Ch. 95 1/2, par. 11-406).

625 ILCS 5/11-408 states in relevant part:
Every law enforcement officer who investigates a motor vehicle accident for which a report is required by this Article or who prepares a written report as a result of an investigation either at the time and scene of such motor vehicle accident or thereafter by interviewing participants or witnesses shall forward a written report of such motor vehicle accident to the Administrator on forms provided by the Administrator under Section 11\u2011411 within 10 days after investigation of the motor vehicle accident, or within such other time as is prescribed by the Administrator.

Sec. 11-406. Duty to report accident.
(a) The driver of a vehicle that is in any manner involved in an accident within this State, resulting in injury to or death of any person, or in which damage to the property of any one person, including himself, in excess of $1,500 (or $500 if any of the vehicles involved in the accident is subject to Section 7\u2011601 but is not covered by a liability insurance policy in accordance with Section 7\u2011601) is sustained, shall, as soon as possible but not later than 10 days after the accident, forward a written report of the accident to the Administrator.

After an Accident: How to Handle Your Own Property Damage Claim

If you are in an accident and fault for the accident lies with the driver, you may want to bring a claim against the driver’s insurance for any injuries you sustain or damage to your property. If you have an injury I would always suggest consulting a lawyer. In such an instance lawyers can provide valuable services that will make things easier and insure a better result. In the event that you are injured, regardless of fault, you should not speak to the driver’s insurance until you have consulted with a lawyer. If you do speak to the insurance be sure you do not give any recorded statements.

In the event that you do not seek medical attention, and you are sure you have no injuries, it is fine to make your own property damage claim with the driver’s insurance. You should understand that in order to issue you payment for the damage, the insurance company will need documents to substantiate your claim for property damage.

Call the driver’s insurance company to get their claim number and find out to whom you should send the materials relevant to your property damage claim. Keep the claim number handy. You should reference that claim number every time you call the insurance. Be sure to ask if they would like to inspect the damaged bicycle. Sometimes adjusters will want to see and photograph the bicycle for themselves. That is a reasonable request with which you should comply.

Take lots of pictures of the bicycle. Take some close up shots of the damage and some shots of the whole bicycle. Sometimes damage won’t be obvious, so err on the side of taking more, rather than fewer pictures.

Next, you should have one or two damage estimates performed at bike shops. Bike shops do this type of thing in the regular course of their business, and there is typically no charge. If they conclude that the bicycle is totaled (meaning the cost to repair the bicycle would outweigh the value) be sure that they give you a replacement estimate. A replacement estimate estimates the cost to replace a bicycle with a modern equivalent. If the bicycle is repairable they will estimate the cost of the necessary parts and labor. Sometimes the shop will point out damage that you didn’t notice initially. Take more photos if you need to better document additional damage.

Before you have repairs performed you should make the bicycle available for inspection and complete all possible photographs. If the bicycle is beyond repair it should be preserved as evidence until the claim is resolved. If you elect not to fix the bicycle, do not remove any parts or make any alterations to the bicycle until the claim is resolved. If you do fix the bicycle, your claim for property damage will be equal to the amount of money you spent to have your bike returned to the functional state it was prior to the accident.

Ideally you still have the original purchase receipt for the bike. If not, don’t worry - most people don’t have it. The original purchase receipt makes haggling over the value of the bicycle harder, assuming you purchased the bicycle new. If it was purchased used there will often not be an original sales receipt.

Some insurance companies have expedited claims processes, but those are in the overwhelming minority, so you generally should not depend on getting a check quickly from the insurance company. You will have to make a decision whether to have the bike fixed or whether to wait for a check.

Once you have all the relevant documents collected you should send them to the adjuster. They should contact you to let you know whether or not they will pay your claim, however, some insurance companies are better than others, so it may be necessary to follow up with them yourself. If they flat refuse to give you an answer you may contact the state department of insurance to determine if there are grounds to file a complaint.

Where can I lock up?

In Chicago we must look to the Chicago Municipal Code which reads in relevant part:

9-52-070 Parking.
No person shall park a bicycle upon a street other than upon the roadway against the curb or upon the sidewalk against a rack, parking meter or sign pole to support the bicycle or against a building or at the curb in such manner as to afford the least obstruction to pedestrian traffic.

(Added Coun. J. 7-12-90, p. 18634; Amend Coun. J. 7-21-04, p. 28659, § 1)

Note that it is specifically legal to lock to a rack, parking meter or sign pole.

Having said that, don't call me when a property owner cuts your bike off the sign in his front yard. Common sense dictates that you must be considerate when parking on someone's property- especially in their grassy yard or parkway.

Also... Don't leave your bike in the same place for more than a week. If you do your bike may be deemed abandoned and it is subject to being removed.

See Chicago Muni Code: Section 9-52-071, regarding Abandoned bicycles, which reads in relevant part:

It shall be unlawful for any person to abandon any bicycle on any public way within the city. A bicycle shall be deemed abandoned if it: (1) is in such a state of disrepair as to be incapable of being operated in its present condition, or (2) has not been moved or used in more than seven days and bears physical indications of having been deserted.

Another Headlight Rant

White headlight and red rear reflector. That's the law.

When you pay dues for a Chicagoland Bicycle Federation membership they give you the choice of a map or a tail light. I have it on good information that CBF is going to switch from tail lights to head lights specifically to make their members more aware of and compliant with the law with respect to headlights.

I never understand why people ride without lights. Having been a driver I can tell you that there is nothing more invisible than a cyclists with no lights or reflectors. You wouldn't drive a car with no headlights; why would you think you could do the same on a bike?

Need a rear reflector? Just let me know and I'll hook you up with some red reflective tape.

Quick Settlements

People are always in such a rush to make a claim. What's the rush? You don't know how much you should ask for until you are done being treating and you are all better. In most cases you have two years from the date of an accident to bring suit for personal injuries. Be careful about this though - another reason to consult with a lawyer. If you are dealing with the CTA you must report the accident withing six months and there is only a one-year period in which to file suit. There is also a one-year limitation when a governmental entity such as a municipality or county is a defendant. Don't make assumptions with respect to the time limit within which you must bring suit - talk to an attorney. Only an attorney familiar with your case can advise you with respect to the proper statute of limitations. There are instances where one might want to file suit quickly, but in the overwhelming majority of instances there is no immediate rush.

The other question I would ask is, "Why are you in a rush?" Claims usually take a long time to resolve. Rushing a claim is like the idiot driver who is willing to run you down just to wait at a red light. A couple insurance companies have expedited claims processes (I believe Geico has expedited property damage claims, and there may be others), but such claims are the exception. Most claims take months to resolve if not years. People want to get money fast, but I would urge them to be patient. Sit back, get better and heal completely. Then you can figure out what you are looking at with respect to medical bills and any scars or permanency. Only when that is all done can one make an assessment of what the claim is worth. Any assessment before that time is premature.

The other reason to wait is that sometimes injuries are not immediately obvious. I see cases all the time where someone has a latent injury that was not obvious until weeks of months following the accident. If you settle quickly you might be on your own with respect to such an injury.

Quick settlement offers are usually compromised. A carrot is dangled in hopes that the claimant will take the quick money rather than full value on a claim. Don't rush things and settle before your claim is ripe. Insurance companies will usually only do that to avoid having to pay full value on a claim worth more than they are paying.

Do we really need to involve lawyers? The illusion of a claim without a lawyer

If you think you are going to handle your claim on your own and there aren't going to be any lawyers involved you are fooling yourself. Insurance companies have armies of lawyers working for them. I formerly was a foot soldier in just such an army, and I can tell you from experience that adjusters are trained to elicit information that will help in the defense against any given claim.

Recorded statements are the best example. I have heard adjusters ask, "Would you like to give a recorded statement?" as if to imply they are helping you. Someone who doesn't know any better might think they are being honest and solidifying their case by submitting to a recorded statement. I have never seen a recorded statement help a claimant, but time and time again I have seen recorded statements used by an insurance company or their counsel to defend against a claimant. Adjusters are trained in clever methods to elicit a recorded statement because recorded statements are such a powerful tool for defending claims. Where does this training come from? The countless defense experiences of the army of insurance defense lawyers.

The illusion of the nobility of handling one's own claim benefits the insurance industry and allows them to deal at an advantage when a claimant decides not to hire a lawyer. A claimant with a lawyer, on the other hand, is insulated from the insurance company and their defense team. The lawyer handles the release of information to the benefit of the client. An experienced lawyer will level the playing field so that both parties, claimant and insurance company, are dealt with fairly.

Syndicate content